Sixty days. A reasonable number of calls, a few viewings, nobody has bought it. The instinct is to hold, because the price is fair and cutting it feels like admitting something.
The arithmetic usually disagrees with the instinct. But before the arithmetic, the diagnosis, because three quite different problems produce the identical symptom and only one of them is fixed by a discount.
Three problems, one symptom
The enquiry pattern tells you which one you have, and you already have the data.
| What you are seeing | The problem | What fixes it |
|---|---|---|
| Plenty of calls, people come, nobody offers near the ask | Priced wrong | A cut, and a real one |
| Few calls, but people who come are interested | Presented wrong | Photographs, listing, placement on the floor |
| Almost no calls at all | Wrong car for this floor | Move it on quickly, at whatever it takes |
The second is the one most often misdiagnosed as the first. A showroom cuts the price on a car that six people have seen and forty should have, and gives away margin without touching the actual constraint. If the phone is not ringing, the price is not the reason, because nobody has got far enough to have an opinion about it.
The third is the hardest to admit, because it means the mistake was made at purchase. It is also the one where hesitation is most expensive: a car nobody in your area wants does not become more wanted in November.
What waiting actually costs
Take a car bought at 2,800,000, asking 3,150,000, standing sixty days. Using a holding cost of about 2,200 a day for a car at this price, on the method in what a standing car costs:
Cut 100,000 now, or hold out another 45 days
| Sell now at 3,050,000 | +3,050,000 |
| Sell in 45 days at 3,150,000 | +3,150,000 |
| Holding cost of those 45 days | −99,000 |
| Net difference of waiting | +1,000 |
Holding out for the full price is worth about a thousand rupees, and only if the buyer actually turns up on day forty-five. If it takes sixty days instead, waiting has cost you 32,000. If it takes ninety, it has cost 98,000, and you will probably end up cutting the price anyway, later, from a weaker position.
This is the calculation that changes behaviour once people have done it themselves with their own numbers. The discount that feels like a loss is usually the cheaper option by a wide margin.
Cut once, properly. Three cuts of 30,000 over two months costs more in holding than a single cut of 100,000 in week eight, and it teaches anyone watching your listings to wait for the next one. A price that drifts downward invites everyone to keep waiting.
Setting the day in advance
The decision is much easier when it is made before you are emotionally involved, which means at purchase.
When you buy, write down the day you will review it. Not a rule for the showroom, a day for this car, based on its price and expected margin. On that day the question is not "what is it worth", it is "what will move this in the next week, and is that better than continuing to pay to own it".
Two things make this work. The review day is written down, so it arrives whether or not anyone remembers. And the answer at that point is a decision rather than a delay, because "let us give it a bit longer" is what a review day exists to prevent.
Close the loop
When a car eventually sells, compare what actually happened with what you expected at purchase: the days you estimated against the days it took, the price you expected against what it made. Over twenty cars this is the most valuable data your showroom produces, and almost nobody keeps it.
It tells you which models you consistently overestimate, which price points move fastest on your floor, and whether your instinct about days-to-sell is any good. That changes what you buy, which is worth more than any single price decision.
Common questions
When should a dealer reduce the price on a car that is not selling?
When the holding cost of continuing to wait exceeds the discount being considered, which is usually sooner than instinct suggests. On a car costing around 2,200 a day to hold, waiting another forty-five days to get an extra 100,000 is worth roughly nothing, and worse than nothing if the buyer takes longer than that. Diagnose first though: if the phone is not ringing at all, price is not the constraint.
Is it better to cut a car's price once or gradually?
Once, and meaningfully. Three cuts of 30,000 over two months cost more in holding than a single 100,000 cut in week eight, and a price visibly drifting downward teaches buyers watching the listing to wait for the next reduction. A gradual cut gets the worst of both: the margin goes anyway and the delay is longer.
How do you tell whether a car is priced wrong or listed wrong?
By the enquiry pattern. Plenty of calls and viewings with no offers near the ask is a pricing problem. Few calls but genuine interest from those who do come is a presentation problem, fixed with better photographs and listing rather than a discount. Almost no calls at all usually means the car is wrong for that floor, which is a sourcing mistake and the most expensive one to sit on.
The review day arrives whether or not anyone remembers
Odometric tracks how long each unit has stood and flags what is ageing, so the price conversation happens on a chosen day rather than when someone notices.
Request a demo Why a profitable showroom runs out of cash